If the Parliament of Uganda is committed to seeing a reduction on lost of tax payer money, why doesn’t it change the law governing the Auditor General’s Office?
Those who are aware of the functioning of auditors know that expenditures are made after the company Auditors have checked and okayed the expenditure. Looks like in Uganda we want the avenue to cheat the tax payer is what some people are interested in; otherwise, it is not clear why the Auditor General’s office does not check transactions before they are undertaken. Are some people interested in this leakage continuing on as a way to cheat the tax payer? When this is done, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) could cease to exist.
Those who are aware of the functioning of auditors know that expenditures are made after the company Auditors have checked and okayed the expenditure. Looks like in Uganda we want the avenue to cheat the tax payer is what some people are interested in; otherwise, it is not clear why the Auditor General’s office does not check transactions before they are undertaken. Are some people interested in this leakage continuing on as a way to cheat the tax payer? When this is done, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) could cease to exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment